|
NetBSD Documentation:
NetBSD/acorn26 TODO
|
This is a list of things I (bjh21) think should be done with NetBSD/acorn26.
Entries higher up the list are ones I intend to do first. If you want to help,
you'd be well-advised to start further down.
The unsupported hardware list may also be of
interest.
-
At present, NetBSD/acorn26 cannot be booted (even to a single user shell) on
a four-megabyte machine. This must be fixed, since few of the target
machines have more than four megabytes of RAM.
-
RISC iX is a 4.3BSD derivative, and as such, binary compatibility with it
ought not to be too hard to attain. Almost entirely useless of course,
but when has that ever stopped me?
-
At the moment, all the soft interrupts in NetBSD/acorn26 are kept in a single
linked list, sorted by priority, and soft interrupts are handled by searching
this list for pending interrupts above the current priority. This is slow,
and should be replaced by something better. A linked list for each priority
and maybe a variable containing the highest priority at which a soft interrupt
can happen sounds like a good approach.
-
Currently, the acorn26 and acorn32 ports have their own similar but distinct
podulebus drivers. This is silly and should be fixed.
-
The bus_space_{read,write}_{multi,region}_2 routines are used quite heavily
in NetBSD/acorn26, since the hardware (mostly) doesn't support DMA.
NetBSD/arm has fast routines to do roughly the right thing in
sys/arch/arm/arm/blockio.S. We should use these, or
derivatives thereof.
-
The dev/rasops code doesn't currently
work on the Arc in <8 bpp, apparently due to bogus endianness assumptions
in the rasops code. This should be fixed, and a 4bpp mode for rasops
written (4bpp would be good for a colour console terminal).
-
DDB support for single-stepping and breakpoints is rather dodgy and really
should be improved.
Up to NetBSD/acorn26 Port Page
(Contact us)
$NetBSD: todo.html,v 1.12 2006/01/29 20:19:50 jschauma Exp $
Copyright © 1994-2003
The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.